On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:15:18AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I think that whatever we say here should focus on what we try to do or > guarantee, not on what actions we think users ought to take, never > mind must take. We can say that we try to avoid making any changes > upon which an application might be relying -- but there surely is some > weasel-wording there, because we have made such changes before in the > name of security, and sometimes to fix bugs, and we will likely to do > so again in the future. But it's not for us to decide how much testing > is warranted. It's the user's system, not ours.
Yes, good point, let's tell whem what our goals are and they can decide what testing they need. > In the end, while I certainly don't mind improving the web page, I > think that a lot of what we're seeing here probably has to do with the > growing popularity and success of PostgreSQL. If you have more people > using your software, you're also going to have more people using > out-of-date versions of your software. Yeah, probably, and we recently end-of-life'ed PG 11. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
