On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 08:58, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I suppose we could attach "autovacuum=off" settings to these tables, > but it doesn't seem to me that that should be necessary. These test > cases are several years old and haven't given trouble before. > Moreover, if that's necessary then there are a lot of other regression > tests that would presumably need the same treatment.
Is it worth running that animal with log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 so we can see what's going on in terms of auto-vacuum auto-analyze in the log? David
