Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes: > On 19/09/2023 01:57, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2023-09-18 13:49:24 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> d) Copy fewer rows to the table in the test. If we copy only 6 rows, for >>> example, the table will have only two pages, regardless of shared_buffers. >>> >>> I'm leaning towards d). The whole test is a little fragile, it will also >>> fail with a non-default block size, for example. But c) seems like a simple >>> fix and wouldn't look too out of place in the test.
>> Hm, what do you mean with the last sentence? Oh, is the test you're >> referencing the relation-extension logic? > Sorry, I said "c) seems like a simple fix ...", but I meant "d) seems > like a simple fix ..." > I meant the attached. This thread stalled out months ago, but chipmunk is still failing in HEAD and v16. Can we please have a fix? I'm good with Heikki's adjustment to the pg_visibility test case. regards, tom lane