On Tuesday, June 26, 2018, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just I don't see this proposal as clean win. More it is not limited only > this case. It should be consistent with DROP INDEX, SEQUENCE, ... > Yes, they are likely all broken in the same way and whomever agrees with the "it's bugged" conclusion and is willing and able to write a patch should check them and possibly add those checks as regression tests. But without a concrete example of problems I'm not going to be convinced there is a downside to fixing this bug. Given it's converting an error into an equivalent end result without the error I'd support a committer who wants to backpatch whatever fix is devised. David J.
