Em seg., 1 de abr. de 2024 às 14:52, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> "Euler Taveira" <eu...@eulerto.com> writes: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > >> Coverity has some reports in the new code > >> pg_createsubscriber.c > >> I think that Coverity is right. > > > It depends on your "right" definition. If your program execution is > ephemeral > > and the leak is just before exiting, do you think it's worth it? > > I agree with Ranier, actually. The functions in question don't > exit() themselves, but return control to a caller that might or > might not choose to exit. I don't think they should be assuming > that an exit will happen promptly, even if that's true today. > > The community Coverity run found a few additional leaks of the same > kind in that file. I pushed a merged fix for all of them. > Thanks Tom, for the commit. best regards, Ranier Vilela
