On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:24 AM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote:
> > On 2 Apr 2024, at 00:56, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > I ended up writing the attached doc patch. I found that some or our > > text was overly-wordy, causing the impact of what we were trying to say > > to be lessened. We might want to go farther than this patch, but I > > think it is an improvement. > > Agreed, this is an good incremental improvement over what we have. > > > I also moved the <strong> text to the bottom of the section > > +1 > > A few small comments: > > +considers performing minor upgrades to be less risky than continuing to > +run superseded minor versions.</em> > > I think "superseded minor versions" could be unnecessarily complicated for > non-native speakers, I consider myself fairly used to reading english but > still > had to spend a few extra (brain)cycles parsing the meaning of it in this > context. > > + We recommend that users always run the latest minor release associated > > Or perhaps "current minor release" which is the term we use in the table > below > on the same page? > I do like the term "current" better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest". -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
