> On 3 Apr 2024, at 21:48, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > On 2024-04-03 We 15:12, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> The >> fact that very few animals run the ssl tests is a pet peeve of mine, it would >> be nice if we could get broader coverage there. > > Well, the only reason for that is that the SSL tests need to be listed in > PG_TEST_EXTRA, and the only reason for that is that there's a possible > hazard on multi-user servers. But I bet precious few buildfarm animals run in > such an environment. Mine don't - I'm the only user. > > Maybe we could send out an email to the buildfarm-owners list asking people > to consider allowing the ssl tests.
I think that sounds like a good idea. -- Daniel Gustafsson
