On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 11:50, Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we can verify this approach won't cause segfaults and can stomach the > regression between 8 and 16 bytes, I'd happily pivot to this approach so > that we can avoid the function call dance that I have in v25. > > Thoughts?
If we're worried about regressions with some narrow range of byte values, wouldn't it make more sense to compare that to cc4826dd5~1 at the latest rather than to some version that's already probably faster than PG16? David
