On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:20 AM Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, sequential scan does not have per-buffer data. I did some logging > and the reason most fully-in-SB sequential scans don't use the fast > path is because read_stream->pending_read_nblocks is always 0.
Hnghghghgh... right, sorry I guessed the wrong reason, it turns out that I made a fast path just a little too specialised for pg_prewarm. Working on it...
