On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:35 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > It's been on my TODO list to automate that in one of my buildfarm > animals, and never got down to do it. I've looked at the current > animal fleet, and it looks that we don't have one yet. Perhaps I've > just missed something?
wal_consistency_checking is very useful in general. I find myself using it fairly regularly. That's probably why it's not finding anything now: most people working on something that touches WAL already know that testing their patch with wal_consistency_checking early is a good idea. Of course it also wouldn't be a bad idea to have a BF animal for that, especially because we already have BF animals that test things far more niche than this. -- Peter Geoghegan
