> On 28 Jun 2018, at 04:54, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I see more that 860 references to openssl as lower case with lots of > noise around file names and translations. And I can see that you missed > two of them: Nice catch, fixed in the attached. > I don't think that the comments are worth bothering for anything else > than HEAD, now should the doc changes be back-patched? I would tend to > do so. Not sure if it’s worth any back-patching at all to be honest, but I’ll leave that call to you. cheers ./daniel
capitalize_OpenSSL-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
