On 29 June 2018 at 02:23, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a.kuzmen...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > I think I found one possible reason for this slowness. Your patch behaves as > expected when there is a dropped output column, but does one extra > comparison when there is a dropped input column. This backwards conversion > is called from ExecInitRoutingInfo. To fix this, I'd just keep a persistent > inner loop counter (see the attached patch).
It's just 2000 comparisons vs 1000. > Still, fixing this doesn't improve the performance. According to perf > report, updatepd.sql spends 25% of time in strcmp, and updatep.sql about > 0.5%, but they are comparing the same column names, even with the same > alignment and relative offsets. I'm completely puzzled by this. On further inspection, the slowdown is coming from the planner in make_inh_translation_list(). The INSERT path does not hit that since the planner's job is pretty simple for simple INSERTs. > As a side thought, we wouldn't have to go through this if we had a hash > table that is easy to use, or perhaps string interning in catcache. Maybe it's better to try the direct lookup and fall back on SearchSysCacheAttName() if the same attnum does not have the same name. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
