On 2024-Apr-18, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > I think the feature implementation should also provide tab completion > for SPLIT/MERGE.
I don't think that we should be imposing on feature authors or committers the task of filling in tab-completion for whatever features they contribute. I mean, if they want to add that, cool; but if not, somebody else can do that, too. It's not a critical piece. Now, if we're talking about whether a patch to add tab-completion to a feature post feature-freeze is acceptable, I think it absolutely is (even though you could claim that it's a new psql feature). But for sure we shouldn't mandate that a feature be reverted just because it lacks tab-completion -- such lack is not an open-item against the feature in that sense. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "That sort of implies that there are Emacs keystrokes which aren't obscure. I've been using it daily for 2 years now and have yet to discover any key sequence which makes any sense." (Paul Thomas)
