> On 19 Apr 2024, at 07:37, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> If everything is addressed, I agree that 0001, 0003, and 0004 can go into >> PG17, the rest later. > > About the PG17 bits, would you agree about a backpatch? Or perhaps > you disagree?
If we want to 0001 can be baclpatched to v15, 0004 to v13 and 0003 all the way. I don't have strong opinions either way. -- Daniel Gustafsson