> On 19 Apr 2024, at 07:37, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> If everything is addressed, I agree that 0001, 0003, and 0004 can go into
>> PG17, the rest later.
> 
> About the PG17 bits, would you agree about a backpatch?  Or perhaps
> you disagree?

If we want to 0001 can be baclpatched to v15, 0004 to v13 and 0003 all the way.
I don't have strong opinions either way.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to