On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:57:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > It looks to me like in the first run it took 3 minutes for the > replay_lsn to catch up to the desired value, and in the second run, > two seconds. I think I have seen previous instances where something > similar happened, although in those cases I did not stop to record any > details. Have others seen this? Is there something we can/should do > about it?
FWIW, I've also seen delays as well with this test on a few occasions. Thanks for mentioning it. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature