On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:00 PM Alena Rybakina <lena.riback...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Hi, thank you for your work with this subject. > > While I was reviewing your code, I noticed that your patch conflicts with > another patch [0] that been committed. > > [0] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGJkOiOCa%2Bmag4BF%2BzHo7qo%3Do9CFheB8%3Dg6uT5TUm2gkvA%40mail.gmail.com > I've rebased the patch and also split the changes: 1: Use pgBufferUsage in Vacuum and Analyze block reporting 2: Stop tracking buffer usage in the now unused Vacuum{Hit,Miss,Dirty} variables 3: Remove declarations of Vacuum{Hit,Miss,Dirty}
v3-0003-Remove-declaration-of-Vacuum-block-usage-tracking.patch
Description: Binary data
v3-0001-Fix-parallel-vacuum-buffer-usage-reporting.patch
Description: Binary data
v3-0002-Remove-unused-tracking-of-vacuum-buffer-usage.patch
Description: Binary data
