Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 01:44:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 to include that, as it offers a defense if someone invokes this
>> function directly. In HEAD we could then rip out the test in the
>> view.
> I apologize for belaboring this point, but I don't see how we would be
> comfortable removing that check unless we are okay with other sessions'
> temporary sequences appearing in the view, albeit with a NULL last_value.
Oh! You're right, I'm wrong. I was looking at the CASE filter, which
we could get rid of -- but the "WHERE NOT pg_is_other_temp_schema(N.oid)"
part has to stay.
regards, tom lane
