Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> writes:
>> Perhaps we should leave the system triggers out of the discussion
>> entirely? More or less like:
>>
>> If a foreign key constraint specifies referential actions (that
>> is, cascading updates or deletes), those actions are performed via
>> ordinary SQL update or delete commands on the referencing table.
>> In particular, any triggers that exist on the referencing table
>> will be fired for those changes. If such a trigger modifies or
>> blocks the effect of one of these commands, the end result could
>> be to break referential integrity. It is the trigger programmer's
>> responsibility to avoid that.
> That's perfect!
Hearing no further comments, done like that.
regards, tom lane
