On 05/15/24 15:31, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:23 PM Chapman Flack <jcfl...@acm.org> wrote: >> What would be wrong with [occurrence], for consistency's sake? > > It was proposed and rejected upthread, but that's not to say that I > necessarily endorse the reasons given.
Apologies for not having read far enough up the thread before replying. Having done so now, I guess I'd just offer one small point: the upthread discussion did mention that 'occurrence' was used by Oracle, and asked "if you're not following Oracle slavishly, exactly what is the argument in its favor?". Nothing else upthread seems to have mentioned that OCCURRENCE is the exact keyword used in ISO SQL for the analogous argument in analogous functions. Maybe that won't have any effect on the outcome either, but it does seem worth getting into the thread. Regards, -Chap