Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > What portability issues do you forsee? We already look up the same symbol in > all the shared libraries ("Pg_magic_func"), so we know that we can deal with > duplicate function names. Are you thinking that somehow we'd end up with > symbol interposition or something?
No, it's the dependence on the physical library file name that's bothering me. Maybe that won't be an issue, but I foresee requests like "would you please case-fold it" or "the extension-trimming rule isn't quite right", etc. regards, tom lane