Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:45:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I think the enum should be nuked altogether, but
>> it's a bit late to be redesigning that for v17 perhaps.
> You're right, WaitEventExtension is better gone. The only thing that
> matters is that we want to start computing the IDs assigned to the
> custom wait events for extensions with a number higher than the
> existing WAIT_EXTENSION to avoid interferences in pg_stat_activity, so
> this could be cleaned up as the attached.
WFM, and this is probably a place where we don't want to change the
API in v17 and again in v18, so I agree with pushing now.
Reminder though: beta1 release freeze begins Saturday.
Not many hours left.
regards, tom lane
