Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks. This looks pretty good to me after a skim, so I'll see about > committing/back-patching it in the near future. IIUC there is likely more > to come in this area, but I see no need to wait.
Uh ... what of this would we back-patch? It seems like v18
material to me.
regards, tom lane
