On Jun 13, 2024, at 21:58, Chapman Flack <jcfl...@acm.org> wrote:
>>>> david=# select jsonb_path_query('1', '$ >= 1');
>>>
>>> Good point. I can't either. No way I can see to parse that as
>>> a <JSON path wff>.
>>
>> Whether we note it as non-standard or not is an open question then, but it
>> does work and opens up a documentation question.
>
> Does the fact that it does work raise any potential concern that our
> grammar is nonconformant in some way that could present a headache
> somewhere else, or down the road with a later standard edition?
I believe this case is already covered in the docs as a Postgres-specific
feature: predicate path expressions.
But even inside filters I don’t understand why &&, ||, at least, currently only
work if their operands are predicate expressions. Seems weird; and your notes
above suggest that rule applies only to !, which makes slightly more sense.
D
