Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I wonder if there's an argument the "persistent" TopTransactionContext should > live under a different name outside of transactions, to avoid references to it > working in a context where it's not valid? It's probably not worth it, but > not sure.
Hm. We could stash the long-lived pointer in a static variable,
and only install it in TopTransactionContext when you're supposed
to use it. I tend to agree not worth it, though.
regards, tom lane
