On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 04:50:59PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > When doing performance hacking on pg_upgrade it's often important to see > individual runtimes to isolate changes. I've written versions of the attached > patch numerous times, and I wouldn't be surprised if others have done the > same.
Indeed: https://postgr.es/m/flat/20230727235134.GA3658499%40nathanxps13 > Is there any interest in adding something like the attached to pg_upgrade? > The > patch needs some cleaning and tidying up but I wanted to to gauge interest > before investing time. I've added it to verbose mode mainly since it's not > really all that informative for regular users I think. I've been using 'ts -i' as Peter suggested [0], and that has worked decently well. One other thing that I've noticed is that some potentially long-running tasks don't have corresponding reports. For example, the initial get_db_rel_and_slot_infos() on the old cluster doesn't report anything, but that is often one of the most time-consuming steps. [0] https://postgr.es/m/32d24bcf-9ac4-b10e-4aa2-da6975312eb2%40eisentraut.org -- nathan