Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 21:24, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 09:08:47PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > > Doesn’t “sizeof” solve the problem? It take in account the > null-termination > > character. > > The size of BackupState->name is fixed with MAXPGPATH + 1, so it would > be a better practice to use strlcpy() with sizeof(name) anyway? > It's not critical code, so I think it's ok to use strlen, even because the result of strlen will already be available using modern compilers. So, I think it's ok to use memcpy with strlen + 1. best regards, Ranier Vilela
