> On 25 Jun 2024, at 22:57, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: >> Before pulling any triggers I think >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4959/ >> should be considered, since Tom found some flaws in the current code around >> how >> timers and timeouts are used. > > That's certainly another issue to consider, but is it really a blocker > for this one?
It's not a blocker, but when poking at the code it seems useful to consider the open items around it. >> However, since Andrew is actively aiming to replace all of this shortly, >> should >> we wait a see where that lands to avoid having to backport another library >> change? > > I would like to see what he comes up with ... but is it likely to > be something we'd risk back-patching? Maybe it'll be a stretch given that it's likely to introduce new dependencies. -- Daniel Gustafsson
