Dear Amit, Euler,

Thanks for giving comment! 0001 was modified per suggestions.

> Yeah, it is a good idea to add a new option for two_phase but that
> should be done in the next version. For now, I suggest updating the
> docs and probably raising a warning (if max_prepared_transactions !=
> 0) as suggested by Noah. This WARNING is useful because one could
> expect that setting max_prepared_transactions != 0 means apply will
> happen at prepare time after the subscriber is created by this tool.
> The WARNING will be useful even if we support two_phase option as the
> user may have set the non-zero value of max_prepared_transactions but
> didn't use two_phase option.

I also think it should be tunable, in PG18+. 0002 adds a description in doc.
Also, this executable warns if the max_prepared_transactions != 0 on the
publisher. Subscriber-side is not checked now because I don't think it is 
helpful,
but it can be easily added. I did not add test for that, because current test 
code
does not check outputs.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
https://www.fujitsu.com/ 

Attachment: v2-0001-pg_createsubscriber-Fix-cases-which-connection-pa.patch
Description: v2-0001-pg_createsubscriber-Fix-cases-which-connection-pa.patch

Attachment: v2-0002-pg_createsubscriber-Warn-the-two-phase-is-disable.patch
Description: v2-0002-pg_createsubscriber-Warn-the-two-phase-is-disable.patch

Reply via email to