On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:46:30 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 02.07.18 10:38, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > >> On 29 Jun 2018, at 18:44, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > >> +1 for shortening it as proposed by Peter. The existing arrangement > >> made sense when it was first written, when there were only about three > >> individual options IIRC. Now it's just confusing, especially since you > >> can't tell very easily whether any of the individual options were > >> intentionally omitted from the list. It will not get better with > >> more options, either. > > > > Marking this "Waiting for Author” awaiting an update version expanding with > > the > > above comment. > > I ended up rewriting that whole section a bit to give it more structure. > I included all the points discussed in this thread. Thank you for fixing this. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services > -- Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
