On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 at 12:08, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > The attached fixes the issue. I'll stare at it a bit more and try to > decide if that's the best way to fix it.
I did that staring work and thought about arranging the code to reduce the number of #ifdefs. In the end, I decided it was better to keep the two "if" checks close together so that it's easy to see that one does > and the other >=. Someone else's tastes may vary. I adjusted the comment to remove the >= mention and pushed the resulting patch and backpatched to 16, where I broke this in 0e480385e. Thanks for the report. David David
