On 8/2/24 09:48, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:03 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 4:45 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Would it provide enough value for effort to explicitly mark leaky
> procedures as such? Maybe that could shrink the grey area enough to be
> protective?
You mean like proleakproof = true/false/maybe?
Yeah, exactly.
<dons flameproof suit>
Hmmm, and then have "leakproof_mode" = strict/lax/off where 'strict' is
current behavior, 'lax' allows the 'maybe's to get pushed down, and
'off' ignores the leakproof attribute entirely and pushes down anything
that merits being pushed?
</dons flameproof suit>
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
