Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 08:46:35AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I propose to fix that by making a copy of the scan keys passed by the caller
>> and make the modifications there.
> No objection, but this would obsolete at least some of these comments (the
> catcache.c ones if nothing else):
That ties into something I forgot to ask: aren't there any copy steps
or other overhead that we could remove, given this new API constraint?
That would help address Robert's concern.
regards, tom lane
