Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize

[Jim Jones]

On 26.08.24 14:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am not strongly against enhancing XMLSERIALIZE, but it can be nice
> to see some wider concept first. Currently the state looks just random
> - and I didn't see any serious discussion about implementation fo
> SQL/XML. We don't need to be necessarily compatible with Oracle, but
> it can help if we have a functionality that can be used for conversions.

Fair point. A road map definitely wouldn't hurt. Not quite sure how to
start this motion though :D
So far I've just picked the missing SQL/XML features that were listed in
the PostgreSQL todo list and that I need for any of my projects. But I
would gladly change the priorities if there is any interest in the
community for specific features.

-- 
Jim