On 18.09.24 02:54, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 08:22:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 03:29:54PM -0300, Marcos Pegoraro wrote:
Em ter., 17 de set. de 2024 às 05:12, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org>
Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) [commit 1] [2]
I think trying to add text to each item is both redundant and confusing,
Also very clutter-y. I'm not convinced that any of this is a good
idea that will stand the test of time: I estimate that approximately
0.01% of people who read the release notes will want these links.
Yes, I think 0.01% is accurate.
But if we keep it I think the annotations have to be very unobtrusive.
I very much agree.
(Has anyone looked at the PDF rendering of this? It seems rather
unfortunate to me.)
Oh, not good. See my build:
https://momjian.us/expire/postgres-US.pdf#page=2890
Those numbers are there because all external links get numbers that
start a 1 at the top of the section and increment for every link --- I
have no idea why. You can see that acronyms that have external links
have the same numbering:
https://momjian.us/expire/postgres-US.pdf#page=3150
I wonder if we should remove the numbers in both cases.
Maybe this shouldn't be done between RC1 and GA. This is clearly a more
complex topic that should go through a proper review and testing cycle.
