Thanks for the review.

On 2018/07/12 22:01, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Amit Langote
> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think your fix is correct.  I slightly modified it along with updating
>>> nearby comments and added regression tests.
>>
>> I updated regression tests to reduce lines.  There is no point in
>> repeating tests like v2 patch did.
> 
> +     *
> +     * For hash partitioning however, it is possible to combine null and non-
> +     * null keys in a pruning step, so do this only if *all* partition keys
> +     * are involved in IS NULL clauses.
> 
> I don't think this is true. When equality conditions and IS NULL clauses cover
> all partition keys of a hash partitioned table and do not have contradictory
> clauses, we should be able to find the partition which will remain unpruned.

I was trying to say the same thing, but maybe the comment doesn't like it.
 How about this:

+     * For hash partitioning, if we found IS NULL clauses for some keys and
+     * OpExpr's for others, gen_prune_steps_from_opexps() will generate the
+     * necessary pruning steps if all partition keys are taken care of.
+     * If we found only IS NULL clauses, then we can generate the pruning
+     * step here but only if all partition keys are covered.

> I
> see that we already have this supported in get_matching_hash_bounds()
>     /*
>      * For hash partitioning we can only perform pruning based on equality
>      * clauses to the partition key or IS NULL clauses.  We also can only
>      * prune if we got values for all keys.
>      */
>     if (nvalues + bms_num_members(nullkeys) == partnatts)
>     {
> 
>       */
> -    if (!generate_opsteps)
> +    if (!bms_is_empty(nullkeys) &&
> +        (part_scheme->strategy != PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH ||
> +         bms_num_members(nullkeys) == part_scheme->partnatts))
> 
> So, it looks like we don't need bms_num_members(nullkeys) ==
> part_scheme->partnatts there.

Yes, we can perform pruning in all three cases for hash partitioning:

* all keys are covered by OpExprs providing non-null keys

* some keys are covered by IS NULL clauses, others by OpExprs (all keys
  covered)

* all keys are covered by IS NULL clauses

... as long as we generate a pruning step at all.  The issue here was that
we skipped generating the pruning step due to poorly coded condition in
gen_partprune_steps_internal in some cases.

> Also, I think, we don't know how some new partition strategy will treat NULL
> values so above condition looks wrong to me. Instead it should explicitly 
> check
> the strategies for which we know that the NULL values go to a single 
> partition.

How about if we explicitly spell out the strategies like this:

+    if (!bms_is_empty(nullkeys) &&
+        (part_scheme->strategy == PARTITION_STRATEGY_LIST ||
+         part_scheme->strategy == PARTITION_STRATEGY_RANGE ||
+         (part_scheme->strategy == PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH &&
+          bms_num_members(nullkeys) == part_scheme->partnatts)))

The proposed comment also describes why the condition looks like that.

>          /*
> -         * Note that for IS NOT NULL clauses, simply having step suffices;
> -         * there is no need to propagate the exact details of which keys are
> -         * required to be NOT NULL.  Hash partitioning expects to see actual
> -         * values to perform any pruning.
> +         * There are no OpExpr's, but there are IS NOT NULL clauses, which
> +         * can be used to eliminate the null-partition-key-only partition.
> 
> I don't understand this. When there are IS NOT NULL clauses for all the
> partition keys, it's only then that we could eliminate the partition 
> containing
> NULL values, not otherwise.

Actually, there is only one case where the pruning step generated by that
block of code is useful -- to prune a list partition that accepts only
nulls.  List partitioning only allows one partition, key so this works,
but let's say only accidentally.  I modified the condition as follows:

+    else if (!generate_opsteps && !bms_is_empty(notnullkeys) &&
+             bms_num_members(notnullkeys) == part_scheme->partnatts)

Attached updated patch.

Thanks,
Amit
diff --git a/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c 
b/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c
index cdc61a8997..a89cec0759 100644
--- a/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c
+++ b/src/backend/partitioning/partprune.c
@@ -854,44 +854,47 @@ gen_partprune_steps_internal(GeneratePruningStepsContext 
*context,
        }
 
        /*
-        * If generate_opsteps is set to false it means no OpExprs were directly
-        * present in the input list.
+        * For list and range partitioning, null partition keys can only be 
found
+        * in one designated partition, so if there are IS NULL clauses 
containing
+        * partition keys we should generate a pruning step that gets rid of all
+        * partitions but the special null-accepting partitions.  For range
+        * partitioning, that means we will end up disregarding OpExpr's that 
may
+        * have been found for some other keys, but that's fine, because it is 
not
+        * possible to prune range partitions with a combination of null and
+        * non-null keys.
+        *
+        * For hash partitioning, if we found IS NULL clauses for some keys and
+        * OpExpr's for others, gen_prune_steps_from_opexps() will generate the
+        * necessary pruning steps if all partition keys are taken care of.
+        * If we found only IS NULL clauses, then we can generate the pruning
+        * step here but only if all partition keys are covered.
         */
-       if (!generate_opsteps)
+       if (!bms_is_empty(nullkeys) &&
+               (part_scheme->strategy == PARTITION_STRATEGY_LIST ||
+                part_scheme->strategy == PARTITION_STRATEGY_RANGE ||
+                (part_scheme->strategy == PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH &&
+                 bms_num_members(nullkeys) == part_scheme->partnatts)))
+       {
+               PartitionPruneStep *step;
+
+               step = gen_prune_step_op(context, InvalidStrategy,
+                                                                false, NIL, 
NIL, nullkeys);
+               result = lappend(result, step);
+       }
+       else if (!generate_opsteps && !bms_is_empty(notnullkeys) &&
+                        bms_num_members(notnullkeys) == part_scheme->partnatts)
        {
                /*
-                * Generate one prune step for the information derived from IS 
NULL,
-                * if any.  To prune hash partitions, we must have found IS NULL
-                * clauses for all partition keys.
+                * There are no OpExpr's, but there are IS NOT NULL clauses, 
which
+                * can be used to eliminate the null-partition-key-only 
partition.
                 */
-               if (!bms_is_empty(nullkeys) &&
-                       (part_scheme->strategy != PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH ||
-                        bms_num_members(nullkeys) == part_scheme->partnatts))
-               {
-                       PartitionPruneStep *step;
+               PartitionPruneStep *step;
 
-                       step = gen_prune_step_op(context, InvalidStrategy,
-                                                                        false, 
NIL, NIL, nullkeys);
-                       result = lappend(result, step);
-               }
-
-               /*
-                * Note that for IS NOT NULL clauses, simply having step 
suffices;
-                * there is no need to propagate the exact details of which 
keys are
-                * required to be NOT NULL.  Hash partitioning expects to see 
actual
-                * values to perform any pruning.
-                */
-               if (!bms_is_empty(notnullkeys) &&
-                       part_scheme->strategy != PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH)
-               {
-                       PartitionPruneStep *step;
-
-                       step = gen_prune_step_op(context, InvalidStrategy,
-                                                                        false, 
NIL, NIL, NULL);
-                       result = lappend(result, step);
-               }
+               step = gen_prune_step_op(context, InvalidStrategy,
+                                                                false, NIL, 
NIL, NULL);
+               result = lappend(result, step);
        }
-       else
+       else if (generate_opsteps)
        {
                PartitionPruneStep *step;
 
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out 
b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
index d15f1d37f1..a3b21130e3 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
@@ -3125,3 +3125,51 @@ explain (costs off) select * from pp_temp_parent where a 
= 2;
 (3 rows)
 
 drop table pp_temp_parent;
+-- multi-column range partitioning and pruning with IS NULL clauses on some
+-- columns
+create table pp_multirange (a int, b int) partition by range (a, b);
+create table pp_multirange1 partition of pp_multirange for values from (1, 1) 
to (100, 100);
+create table pp_multirange2 partition of pp_multirange for values from (100, 
100) to (200, 200);
+create table pp_multirange_def partition of pp_multirange default;
+-- all partitions but the default one should be pruned
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a = 1 and b is null;
+                QUERY PLAN                 
+-------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on pp_multirange_def
+         Filter: ((b IS NULL) AND (a = 1))
+(3 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a is null and b is null;
+                  QUERY PLAN                   
+-----------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on pp_multirange_def
+         Filter: ((a IS NULL) AND (b IS NULL))
+(3 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a is null and b = 1;
+                QUERY PLAN                 
+-------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on pp_multirange_def
+         Filter: ((a IS NULL) AND (b = 1))
+(3 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a is null;
+             QUERY PLAN              
+-------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on pp_multirange_def
+         Filter: (a IS NULL)
+(3 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where b is null;
+             QUERY PLAN              
+-------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on pp_multirange_def
+         Filter: (b IS NULL)
+(3 rows)
+
+drop table pp_multirange;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql 
b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql
index b8e823d562..cf56fdac40 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql
@@ -823,3 +823,19 @@ create temp table pp_temp_part_def partition of 
pp_temp_parent default;
 explain (costs off) select * from pp_temp_parent where true;
 explain (costs off) select * from pp_temp_parent where a = 2;
 drop table pp_temp_parent;
+
+-- multi-column range partitioning and pruning with IS NULL clauses on some
+-- columns
+create table pp_multirange (a int, b int) partition by range (a, b);
+create table pp_multirange1 partition of pp_multirange for values from (1, 1) 
to (100, 100);
+create table pp_multirange2 partition of pp_multirange for values from (100, 
100) to (200, 200);
+create table pp_multirange_def partition of pp_multirange default;
+
+-- all partitions but the default one should be pruned
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a = 1 and b is null;
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a is null and b is null;
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a is null and b = 1;
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where a is null;
+explain (costs off) select * from pp_multirange where b is null;
+
+drop table pp_multirange;

Reply via email to