I forgot to attach the patch file, so I'm attaching it in reply.


2024-09-30 15:02 に btsugieyuusuke さんは書きました:
Hi hackers,
I found probably something to fix in pg_walsummary.

pg_walsummary specifies “f:iqw:” as the third argument of getopt_long().

/* process command-line options */
while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "f:iqw:",
                                long_options, &optindex)) != -1)

However, only i and q are valid options.

        switch (c)
        {
                case 'i':
                        break;
                case 'q':
                        opt.quiet = true;
                        break;
                default:
                        /* getopt_long already emitted a complaint */
pg_log_error_hint("Try \"%s --help\" for more information.", progname);
                        exit(1);
        }

Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed?

Best regards,
Yusuke Sugie
From 7ced18bad958156a18bab6b6a9abe554fb44f970 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuusuke Sugie <btsugieyuus...@oss.nttdata.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:06:10 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Character not present in option

---
 src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c
index 93f6e6d408..f6a262d318 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c
+++ b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	handle_help_version_opts(argc, argv, progname, help);
 
 	/* process command-line options */
-	while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "f:iqw:",
+	while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "iq",
 							long_options, &optindex)) != -1)
 	{
 		switch (c)
-- 
2.40.1

Reply via email to