> On 1 Oct 2024, at 00:43, Michael Banck <mba...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> Yeah, I think a view like pg_stat_progress_checksums would work. >> >> Added in the attached version. It probably needs some polish (the docs for >> sure do) but it's at least a start. > > Just a nitpick, but we call it data_checksums about everywhere, but the > new view is called pg_stat_progress_datachecksums - I think > pg_stat_progress_data_checksums would look better even if it gets quite > long.
That's a fair point, I'll make sure to switch for the next version of the patch. -- Daniel Gustafsson
