On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 6:25 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 06:33:29PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > > It is better to write the above statement as: > > > > "pg_upgrade</application></link> now preserves replication slots on > > > > publishers and full subscription's state on subscribers". This is > > > > because replication slots are preserved on publishers. The subscribers > > > > preserve the subscription state. > > > > > > So, as I understand it, this preservation only happens when the _old_ > > > Postgres version is 17+. > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > Do we want to try and explain that in the > > > Postgres 17 release notes? > > > > > > > It would be good if we can capture that information without bloating > > the release document. However, this information is already present in > > pg_upgrade docs, so users have a way to know the same even if we can't > > mention it in the release notes. > > I have developed the attached patch to mention it is "logical" slots, > and to mention its future use. >
LGTM. Thanks! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
