On 2018-Jul-18, Tom Lane wrote: > I can sympathize with the eyestrain argument against t/f, but the > above doesn't seem like an improvement --- in particular, "Data" > as the column header seems quite content-free. My counterproposal > is to keep "Key" as the header and use "Yes"/"No" as the values.
I think "Key: no" is a bit obscure -- using "included" is a bit more self-documenting and lends better to documentation searches. > I'd be OK with "Key"/"Included" as the values if someone can > propose an on-point column header to go with those. "Role"? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
