On 2018-Jul-23, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:42:08PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> So, +1 from me for having a directory for each extension. > > > So, like Stephen, that's a +1 from me. > > Same here. One-file-per-extension is too strongly biased to tiny > extensions (like most of our contrib examples). > > I don't have a real strong opinion on whether it's too late to > push this into v11. I do not think it'd break anything other than > packagers' lists of files to be installed ... but it does seem > like a new feature, and we're past feature freeze.
Frankly, I'd rather make things as easy as possible for third-party extension writers. I'd go as far as backpatching further (considering transforms were introduced in 9.5) but I hesitate on that, because of the packagers argument. pg11 seems fair game to me, though. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services