On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:58:42AM -0400, Jeff Janes wrote: > > But it was really waiting for the syncs of the new -D dir to finish. The > > attached patch adds a -v notice that it is starting to do the sync, with > > the wording taken from initdb's equivalent message. > > This is a good idea. Would we want that back-patched? I am sure that > nobody is going to complain for an extra informational log. > Thanks for committing it. It is probably safer not to backpatch, as someone might have scripts that look at the output of -v so it shouldn't change between minor releases. I don't think looking at those would be a good idea, but they may have their reasons. Cheers, Jeff
