On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 4:36 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > > Please find attached a patch to fix this. Would this be a > > back-patchable bug? > > In my view, this is not a bug fix, but an improvement, and therefore > should not be back-patched. I was leaning toward "bug fix" but what we are actually doing here is compensating for our default presentation of null being the empty string; so I'm inclined to side with "usability" and not back-patching. David J.
