I am still having problems rebasing this patch. I can not figure it out on my own.
On Sun, 27 May 2018 at 5:31 pm, Mark Rofail <markm.rof...@gmail.com> wrote: > issue 1: `pg_constraint.c:564` > I need to check that `conppeqop` is not null and copy it but I don't know > how to check its type since its a char* > > issue 2: `matview.c:768` > I need to pass `fkreftype` but I don't have it in the rest of the functIon > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Mark Rofail <markm.rof...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I was wondering if anyone knows the proper way to write a benchmarking >> test for the @>> operator. I used the below script in my previous attempt >> https://gist.github.com/markrofail/174ed370a2f2ac24800fde2fc27e2d38 >> The script does the following steps: >> >> 1. Generate Table A with 5 rows >> 2. Generate Table B with n rows such as: >> every row of Table B is an array of IDs referencing rows in Table A. >> >> The tests we ran previously had Table B up to 1 million rows and the >> results can be seen here : >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJvoCusMuLnYZUbwTBKt%2Bp6bB9GwiTqF95OsQFHXixJj3LkxVQ%40mail.gmail.com >> >> How would we change this so it would be more exhaustive and accurate? >> >> Regards, >> Mark Rofail >> >> >
