> On 26 Jun 2025, at 15:33, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So on the whole I prefer the "void" approach. I'm not dead > set on that though, it's just a niggling worry.
I think the likelyhood of it being a problem in practice is pretty slim, but it's still a stronger argument than my "match an API we're still not aligned with". The attached v7 reverts back to void return. -- Daniel Gustafsson
v7-0001-Initial-patch-by-Tom-Lane.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0002-pg_dump-compression-API-write_func.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0003-pg_dump-compression-API-open_func.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0004-pg_dump-compression-API-close_func.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0005-pg_dump-compression-API-LZ4Stream_init.patch
Description: Binary data
v7-0006-pg_dump-compression-API-read_func-gets_func.patch
Description: Binary data
