On 12.06.25 05:23, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
+1 to focusing on the 0001 patch.
Since this isn't a bug fix, I'm not sure back-patching is strictly necessary.
That said, it does improve consistency and test coverage, e.g., by adding checks
like help text length, so I'd be fine with back-patching if others see value in
it.
Initially I thought this was helpful even for back branches, but it is not
100% needed.
No objections even if it is only applied to master - it can check new features
in
future.
committed
