On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 3:47 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 1:33 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 12:37:48PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > >> > (1) adds tab completion support for the REJECT_LIMIT option, which was > > >> > introduced in v18 > > >> > (2) splits the tab completion logic between COPY FROM and COPY TO to > > >> > reflect their different options. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Given REJECT_LIMIT is a new v18 feature, it seems to me that (1) is an > > > oversight of this feature, but I also agree that it's not a bug and > > > doesn't block the release. > > > > > > How does the RMT feel about the change (1)? Nathan, would you be OK with > > > that? > > > > 0001 sure seems like an oversight in commit 4ac2a9b to me. In any case, I > > argued that we should fix tab completion for unlogged partitioned tables in > > v18 [0], and this seems pretty similar. > > > > > > TBH I'd even say that 0002 is fixing a bug and could be back-patched. I've > > added rmt@ here in case Tomas or Heikki feel differently. > > Thank you for your confirmation. I've just pushed the change (1) and > am waiting for more comments on the change (2). >
Thinking of the 0002 patch, I'm also inclined to agree that this fixes a bogus tab completion behavior for COPY command and can be back-patched to v14. In v14, c273d9d8ce reworked the tab completion for COPY command and supports the completion for the options of FORMAT within a WITH clause so we cannot back-patch it to v13. Torikoshi-san, could you please prepare the patch for other branches too if you agree with this direction? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com