On 30/6/2025 09:26, Richard Guo wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:28 PM Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, this patchset is targeted for v19. Maybe we could be more
aggressive and have 0001 and 0002 in v18? (no chance for 0003 though)
This patchset does not apply anymore due to 2c0ed86d3. Here is a new
rebase.
This patchset does not apply anymore, due to 5069fef1c this time.
Here is a new rebase.
I like the general idea of this work. But I wonder, why is a new hash
table designed to store only the notnullattnums field? From the
discussion, it is not apparent why not to cache all (or most of) the
data needed for get_relation_info. In cases where multiple subqueries
reference the same table, it could save some cycles and memory.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
