Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 22:21, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The attached patch does what was discussed in the pgsql-docs
>> thread at [1], namely change the four-argument variants of
>> width_bucket() to allow their first argument to be NaN,
>> treating that value as larger than any non-NaN.
> LGTM.
Pushed, thanks for looking at it.
> It could even be argued that this is a bug fix, but the lack of prior
> complaints justifies not back-patching.
Yeah, that was my feeling as well.
regards, tom lane
