On 2025/07/04 17:25, Andrey Borodin wrote:
On 4 Jul 2025, at 10:50, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
From the discussion in [1], it seems this typedef was originally used as
a function argument in early versions of the patch. However,
the argument was removed in v23, and the typedef was accidentally left behind.
Yes, your analysis is correct. We could make common checking function and
argument was not needed.
The attached patch removes this unused typedef to clean up the dead code.
Thoughts?
Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this!
Thanks for the review! I've pushed the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation
