Yes, this should say average On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:42 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 18:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > One other thing that bothers me as I look at the output is > > > > Per loop time including overhead: 731.26 ns > > > > That's stated in a way that makes it sound like that is a > > very solid number, when in fact it's just the average. > > We see from these test cases that there are frequently > > a few outliers that are far from the average. I'm tempted > > to rephrase as > > > > Average loop time including overhead: 731.26 ns > > > > or some variant of that. Thoughts? > > I think that is a good idea. > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()? Tom Lane
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()? Hannu Krosing
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()? Tom Lane
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofda... Tom Lane
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettime... Andrey Borodin
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettime... Hannu Krosing
- Re: What is a typical precision of ge... Tom Lane
- Re: What is a typical precision o... Tom Lane
- Re: What is a typical precision o... Laurenz Albe
- Re: What is a typical precision o... Hannu Krosing
- Re: What is a typical precision o... Tom Lane
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofda... Bernd Helmle
- Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()? Vik Fearing